Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 03:35

What’s next?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What species of fish are horse mackerels?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Erin Patterson tells murder trial exotic mushrooms 'have more flavour' - BBC
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
A New Law of Nature Attempts to Explain the Complexity of the Universe - WIRED
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Why cant I ever fall asleep with my boyfriend?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Thank you.
Banking data reveals early warning signs of cognitive decline in older adults - Medical Xpress
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.